Tuesday, 4 December 2012

FRUITION



Hearing and Understanding;
TO BEAR FRUIT ONE MUST, SEE, HEAR AND UNDERSTAND.
the path to fruition.

“Franko, go there and ask to get something,” David states. I wondered to self, where exactly and what? I therefore look at the ambiguous demand David my elder brother seek and fail to reach a deduction.
It’s quite cumbersome to give what you don’t have, or not even an idea / clue of. Jesus demands of us fruits which He will test with fire albeit the setoff mark is His word.
I long for the moment!

On a good day, He taught numerous parables but this very one intrigued the disciples; the sower who cast his seed but there destination were heterogeneous: some fell on the roadside and birds devoured it, the other on the rock but fell victim of the sun and insufficiency of earth-death concluded, the third fell on thorns which did not escape the brutality of its spikes which choked it to its last breath; finally the last fell on good ground which bore thirty folds, sixty folds and hundred fold of fruits.
Where do you fall?
 Why?

Let’s watch this!
The roadside seed; doesn’t understand the word giving the devil chance to steal it. Remember he comes not but for to steal, kill and destroy (John 10:10). Watch out!!!
Do you understand? Hosea chapter 4 verses 6, “My people perish because of lack of knowledge, because they rejected M word will I also reject them…”  James chapter 1 verses 5...Does anyone lack wisdom let ask the Father.

On the rock; receives with joy but has no root in himself; no fruit. Are you deep of shallow? Have root in yourself- self value and devotion. David says deep calls unto deep, Moses …life connects with life and Jesus…let the dead burry the dead. The strong wind can’t affect a well rooted   and founded house. Tribulations no threat; because He overcame so shall you.

Amidst the thorns; receives but the cares of this world choke the word. What company do you have? Good or bad, remember what Apostle Paul said, “don’t be deceived bad company corrupt (good) morals”

Good ground; hears and understands thus fruits. What is your status? It implores a relationship. Not just a mere relationship but a ‘till death part us’ one. John chapter 15verses 1-10. A relationship is the mother of results, it wombs the outcome warmly. Enter one today with Jesus.

Fruition requires two elements;
  • hearing and
  • understanding.
The product of these is a 30/ 60/ 100 % fruit.
Do you posses any?

Jesus cries out; let him who has ears hear, why? Faith comes by hearing and hearing of the word of God (Romans 10:17). It’s the path of fruition.
Cry out to Him who able of doing exceedingly abundantly above all that we ask or think, according to the power that works in us.
Ask for that power. Behold fruits knock your door

SHALOM!!!

Saturday, 1 December 2012

ROLE OF National Council of Churches of Kenya (NCCK)



QUESTION; Assess the role of civil society in the democratization process of any one East Africa country


Role of Civil society in the democratization process of Africa;
Case of the National Council of Churches of Kenya (NCCK); Kenya.


“…such negotiated and controlled transitions, the stimulus for democratization, and particularly the pressure to complete the process, have typically come from the “resurrection of the civil society,” the restructuring of the public space, and mobilization of all manner of independent groups and grassroot movements.” Larry j. diamond says. He further discuses all these zeroing to civil society. He earlier put to task the readers to identify what force is behind great crusades, brave band s of students, women match to give only a partial list other than the name civil society.
In the article “democracy and democratization in Africa, Sanjeev Khagram cites the definition of civil society as, ‘Alfred Stepan defines civil society as "that arena where manifold social movements...and civic organizations...express themselves and advance their interests." Naomi Chazan adds to this by suggesting that civil society "refers to the segment of society that interacts with the state, influences the state, and yet is distinct from the state." Thus, civil society is the intermediary arena of associations between society more broadly and political institutions.’”
He further cites Naomi Chazan, "Africa's Democratic Challenge: Strengthening Civil Society and the State," World Policy Journal (Spring 1992), p. 282, as, “vibrant civil societies are seen as a critical check on authoritarian rule. The nurturing of civil society is perceived as the most effective means of controlling repeated abuses of state power, holding rulers accountable to their citizens, and establishing the foundations for durable democratic government.”  Diamond further attests to Chazan, “civil society is alive and well when citizens participate in church groups, professional associations, women's groups, trade unions, human rights groups, and civic associations in order to press for state and economic reforms.”
Frank Khachina Matanga in the “civil society and politic in Africa,” cites two types of civil society as progressive or confrontational when it opposes and confronts authoritarian rule and reactionary when it entrenches the authoritarian regime-morals, political and economic support. Diamond (1994), reveals the diversity of civil society, “It encompasses a vast array of formal and informal organizations engaged in a wide range of activities to achieve economic, cultural, educational and developmental goals.” Emma Porio also associates civil society to movements. “Social movements constitute an important subset of civil society. He further cites Rocamora et al (1998) also added that the growth of civil societies has to be understood at four inter-related levels: state, political society, civil society and international actors. They also argue that democratic movements have to be always calibrated within the post- Cold War politics. For a better appreciation of the relationship among these entities, see schematic diagram below.”




 







Figure 1. Schematic representation of the relationship of state, civil society, and the market.

He (Frank, 2000) attribute the rise of civil society in Kenya to the lack of formal political organization (1982-1992) to confront government, this gave credibility to civil society. Secondly, even multiparty system, schism along tribal ethnic and personal ambitions for power empowered civil societies thus continued role of civil society, however the government derived various oppositional political attempts to contain civil society as legislation, propaganda, co-optation, removal of anti established civil society loaders, and so forth.
The civil society in Kenya is described as, “Kenya has a varied and dense network of voluntary and civic associations. Urban civil society appears to be quantitatively different from that found in rural areas. Rural associations are oriented essentially towards improving the material quality of life; a large proportion of rural voluntary organizations are credit unions, cooperatives and labour pools. Student and professional groups are concentrated in urban civil society and played a major role in pressing the government to reinstate multiparty politics in the period 1990-1992 and to accede to at least minimal constitutional reforms prior to the operatives 1997 general Elections.” (Preface Leadership Book-1 East Africa)

The church at the fore front, we dichotomize the role the National Councils of Churches of Kenya, (NCCK). Many undermine the church’s role, but the church itself recognizes it position in the civil society, this paints a picture of pro and anti government positions; “…Church recognises its position within civil society and has, at times, joined in the struggle for justice, although at other times it has opted to be either supportive of the government in authority, or has remained neutral with respect to political and socio-economic issues.”(Gibbs and Ajulu, 1999:43)

 The National Council of Churches of Kenya (NCCK) formed in 1966 which initially constituted thirty-seven mainline Protestant churches and para-church organizations related to the Church Province of Kenya (CPK) and the Presbyterian Church of East Africa (PCEA) denominations.
It’s on this forum which is the main arm through which the constituent churches exercise their prophetic role (implying the churches’ involvement in speaking out on political and socio-economic issues of injustice and oppression) and involvement in civil society in Kenya. Its note worth that the Catholic Church joined the body latter on albeit it’s already involvement in politics.
With such fabricated ground of the NCCK, the role they played in the advocacy and democratization of Kenya is lined below;
The NCCK played a major in defining Church-State relations. From the start (1960 through 1970) it had a strong rather uncritical relationship with the state. In 1966, in an article in its own magazine, Target, it successfully criticised the governments proposed plan to build a prestigious and expensive headquarters as a result these plans were shelved. Secondly, in 1970 when it criticised the promulgation of the Hanging Act. Also at certain times it gave support to individually initiated voices of protest against government injustices like in 1969 Henry Okullu in condemning the tribal oathing (the Kikuyu vowed an oath never to leave power, post Tom Mboya death.)

Through its objectives, the church addressed socio-economic issues as opposed to political ones operating within the governmental framework. This it did in three majors grounds; 1) Christian Education and Training (both formal and informal education and was able to identify the plight of youth, thus the ‘‘Village Polytechnic’ programmes’ which became very popular).It also under took civic education n the mid-80s and early 90s which aided in the educating and preparing the civil society for multi party election and democracy. By these activities it functioned as an intermediary between the state and the government. 2) Relief, Rehabilitation and Resettlement; and 3.)Christian Service and Urban Development. On the other hand, the church was use to majorly do development work and shun politics. In worse cases, a situation was created wherein the Church functioned as a loyalist political structure. Priest taught people to only be law abiding, like the Kenyatte era the church battled with the Harambee philosophy. NCCK General-Secretary, John Kamau, a bosom friend to president thus unable to address issues of concern directly; case to note political murder of a prominent politician J. M. Kariuki. Divisions in the church also contributed to the weakening of the church voice.

In 1986, it condemned and won public support against the queuing instead of the secret ballot system. Under the shepherd hood of Bishop Gitari, a pastor’s conference was set where over 1200 pastors attended and formed a statement and signed by the NCCK general secretary and dispatched to the press. The Roman Catholic Church (RCC) also gave full support as it debuted. It achieved the democratic way of voting, the RCC bishop wrote a warning letter to the president, they condemned queuing as a method of forcing people into compromising their preferences out of fear of their superiors.
 However, the government only exempted clerics, senior civil servants as a bid to silence the church. The president also sought alliance, thus the formation of the Evangelical Fellowship of Kenya (EFK) registered in 1976 but operational in 1980 and at limelights in 1990-91 after president visit by her heads. It comprised the African Inland Church (AIC), the Reformed Church of East Africa (RCEA), the Kenya Assemblies of God (KAG), and the African Gospel Church (AGC).

The NCCK raised issues with the government based on  its ability to provide clearly documented evidence of such issues for example in the 1988 rigging of the general election, some pastors of the CPK diocese of Eldorret led by Bishop Muge took the courageous step of collecting data from Tinderet constituency where there had been threats of intimidation if the constituents did not vote for a certain candidate - Mr. Sego, against the incumbent MP, Mr. Henry Kosgey. A survey was carried out by three pastors, Mr. Sego (total of 3341 votes) and the incumbent MP Mr. Kosgey (total of 9385 votes
) The outcome was that Mr. Sego with a lower total vote was declared the winner. NCCK published the results in its magazine Beyond, which incurred government wrath to the end. The editor of the magazine Mr. Bedan Mbugwa was imprisoned and the magazine was proscribed, by this transparency was upheld thus democratization.

It strongly condemned the government and its abuse of power, like : passing resolutions without proper debates for example, the declaration of the one-party state was done after only 45 minutes!; rigging of elections; misuse of public property and other social ills. While opposing one party state for a democratic multiparty election in Kenya, professional association and opposition dissidents later joined. In addition, under the leadership of Bishop Gitari it used a mixture of law and scriptures to guard her actions like the usage of Romans 13, set against Revelations 13 plus the passage in Mark 12:17 to develop a prophetic theology, “Politics to the Church was too important to be left to the politicians alone. The Church was to realise that the State was failing to protect its citizens, and instead was manipulating them as in Revelations 13, where it becomes the beast and an apostate authority that needs to be resisted and dethroned. The Church was to articulate that God’s authority was superior to State authority which must operate within limits. Where the State violates those limits hence clashing with God’s authority, then loyalty to God’s authority must come first.”

It carried out sensitization and education role like a Department of Justice and Peace in 1991 was created (collaboration efforts of RCC and NCCK) with which it was determined to continue fighting State injustices through a programme of educating people about their political rights and democracy. This helped the NCCK redefine their major objective as to ‘promote an interpretation and application of the Gospel of Jesus Christ in a way that gives meaning in the daily lives of people thus creating a united just and sustainable society’. Their activities thus included;
1. help churches identify analyse and disseminate information on global, national and local issues that influence their daily lives;
2. facilitate research on two or three national issues and encourage a common
approach among churches;
3. work towards an inclusive interpretation of the Gospel which leads to social
action;
4. promote and advocate for protection of human rights and natural social
responsibilities; and
5. build churches’ capacity to process for the creation of a just society. (NCCK
1996: 1-5).
In its bid to educate and sensitise, themes provided for in the literature included: 1. democracy as a way of life; 2. understanding multi-party democracy in Kenya; 3. the role of opposition in multi-party parliament; and, 4. participation in elections. All this as done joisted on the hope that they (Kenyans) would be empowered to become politically active; which dream came through in 1993-mulitiparty elections that unfortunately saw the incumbent government back.

In a nut shell, it’s quite clear that with the political atmosphere of Kenya par say the divided opposition, democratization was a way to far dream to achieve of rather city in dwell in. the civil society especially the church that had a big constituency was the most place body to confront the government for democratization. Alongside the church (NCCK), were other civil societies like the Kenya Law society (KLS), the students body and trade unions that supplemented and complement the efforts of the church thus a realised dream.














Reference:
Larry J. Diamond, (1994); Rethinking Civil Society; Toward Democratic Consolidation, Journal of Democracy  Vol 5, No. 3, July 1994.
Frank Khachina Matanga, (2000.) Paper Title: Civil Society And Politics In Africa: The Case of Kenya Conference: Fourth International Conference Of Istr, Trinity College, Dublin, Ireland, July 5-8, 2000.

Sanjeev Khagram, (1993) Democracy and democratization in Africa: a plea for pragmatic possibilism. (Challenges to Democracy) Africa Today September 22, 1993

Sara Gibbs and Deborah Ajulu,(1999), The Role of the Church in Advocacy: Case Studies from Southern and Eastern Africa; ISBN 1-897748-51-5. March 1999.

Emma Porio, Civil Society and Democratization in Asia: Prospects and Challenges in the New Millennium
Preface Leadership Book-1 East Africa, (2007), document/ preface leadership book-1 east Africa.doc.18/09/07.

 
















Thursday, 3 May 2012

MERITS AND DEMERITS OF AN INHOUSE PR DEPARTMENT AND OUTSOURCING/A CONSULTANCY PR FIRM




 THIS DOCUMENT IS A PRESENTATION OF A COURSE WORK: MERITS AND DEMERITS OF IN HOUSE PR DEPARTMENT AND OUT SOURCING.


Question: Analysis the advantages and disadvantages of;
                a).having an in house PR department in an organization
                b). outsourcing a PR consultancy firm.


PR is a communication function of management through which organizations adapt to, alter and maintain their environment for the purpose of achieving organizational goals-Professor Lawrence W. long and Todd Hunt.
 It entails a range of activities which are thus; issues management, counseling, government relations, special events, name it; all these can be achieved in two ways- in house deemed internally and by outsourcing-externally.
Johanna Brown a contributor to the eHow website defines in house PR department as, “…it means that they have at least one PR practitioner on staff.” (Updated on 16 March 2012). With such strata at hand, a company is capable of achieving its desired goals internally. The following are the advantages and disadvantages of an in-house department in an organization The advantages are thus;.

There is easy access to top management (http://www.craigpearce.info). PR being an important arm of a company, if hosted by the company herself, the practitioners get easily to top management; thus their credibility is visible when they present their budget to the top management, (Dough, Judy & Dean, 1996). This partly helps curb dilution of information and saves time in time s of crises’

The in-house department besides the easy access to top management has the priviledge to have access historical and confidential information about a company, (Johanna Brown-http://www.ehow.com.Updated on 16 March 2012). This enables the practitioner to easily develop appropriate communication strategies in line with the historical factors and the confidential information which helps the company to the peak of a ‘home made product,’ as opposed to ‘exported products

When hosted in house, it harbors a stable environment void of uncertainties and distress. The department is taken as a ‘home child’, thus the tense environment though resent are minimal.
In addition, the culture of fear springing from the strong focus is reduced. The tale of ‘billable hours + my job threat =stress and uncertainty is breached away to a great level. The practitioners are assured of their pay and benefits like leave, insurances and so on. (Ibid).

In house departments tend to enjoy employee-centric feature of companies. When the performance reviews, counseling, leave provisions are allotted, they are much more employee oriented, especially those on the staff, (Ibid).


There is consistency and whole sum service of an organization (issuesinmic.wikispace.com). Consistency is guaranteed due to the availability of the practitioners and it is for the organization own product; this redeems time and resources. The fact that it’s internally hosted, it concentrates only and only on the hosts issues which results in to the peculiar communication strategies and a broad scale of the company- specialization. (Ibid).
 However, in-house PR department in an organization has disadvantage s as follows;
There is lack of impartiality which partly arises due to their loyalty to the company, they biase favor of it often are uncritical. Due to zeal and pressure if located in the marketing department.(www.goodrealtionship.info). They usually give a blind eye and a deaf ear to the outsiders in favor of inside. This is unethical-non objectivity ands fairness.

There is the existence of a narrow cope of experience. The department may be headed by an expert in a single field like journalism or even marketing; when diversity emerges such department falls prey due to limited knowledge of it and  an expert in the ‘irrelevant field ’ at the time / moment (Jerfkins1993-.ibid).

There is lack of training, especially in cases of transfer of senior management and their reluctance for senior courses in the PR department. Due to a crisis, top mangers from other departments are copied and pasted in the PR department without adequate training in PR; and to worsen matter, they disdain the efforts of upgrading.
In addition, there is difficulty in training other employee in cases of many branches which arte far apart: partly due to the size of the organization being small. The transfer factor has been responsible for the adversarial situation between the media and the PR departments.

In-house PR departments suffer from the allocation of responsibilities to potential top management executive, defying professional ethic of specified knowledge of a subject. This has also partly caused the intense relations between the media and the PR Department being adversarial in nature.

They often employ PR practitioners for wrong reasons, especially to protect top management form the media; they act as apologist for top managements inadequacies. In addition they are overloaded with irrelevant work for instance of the human resource department, the marketing department to mention a few which ahs resulted into the poor performance of these departments and worse of it all the department has been taken as a ‘puppet’

On the other hand outsourcing simply implies a company purchases a product or service from a third party as opposed to producing them in house. It is the responsibility of the outsourced firm to help the company achieve its desired goal-external assistance through a payment. Outsourcing can be done for short term or long term basis, and the following are its advantages.
Outsourcing involves low personal costs (www.PoRtolio.htm) which entails wages and no employee benefits thus as reduced overhead costs for equipment and space (Baker 2001 cited in Ibid.) in addition to the low costs they can be anticipated by the client company (Wetchester2002 as cited in Ibid)

There is effectiveness, due to the inability of a single person to handle company matters partly due to overload of work irrelevant in some cases, outsourcing foots with greater effectiveness and advance d resources .
It also guarantees speed and quality due specialization. Quality as a result from capitalization on a particular issue and having great expertise in the field.

There is flexibility which results from the upper hand over the outsourced company. The company has the power to direct the outsourced firm to work on their directives, thus the organization can shift the outsourced company from one thing to another powered by payments.

It matches along with extra expertise and knowledge rendering multiply skills (Cutlip, Centre, and Broom, 2002). The wide range of business and contacts enables great success in building relation ship and rapport with the media. The agencies are well acquainted with the facets of the media; they know how and when senior reporters like to receive their information (Tyler 2006-Ibid)

It brings about shift of focus in organizations due to specific work and recommendations of their results. The organizations follow the recommendations thus a shift from less consequential issue to more intricate and influential once in the long run increasing the likeness of organization success (Baker 2001-Ibid)

It renders impartiality pertly because it does not suffer from internal myopia and are not zealously loyal to the Organization. They come in with fresh perspective and take up the job as their own (Dough, Judy and Dean 1996) the internal problems do not threaten them does objectivity and independence

Out sourcing guarantees an all round communication strategy since they are outsiders with expertise. They create a linkage between and among the insiders and outsiders having both the inside and outside ears and eyes of the organization resulting into solid information paving way for great and appropriate communication strategy for the organization.

However out sourcing has disadvantages as follows.
It minimizes the clients that is to say their first priority is else where.
The desired attention is not rendered partly because of the organization small size thus the big farms take precedence due to their size status and financial consideration (Boroshok 2006) secondly they are availed only where payment is made, and they priotize money.

There is lack of clear knowledge and understanding of the organization, which comes in terms of the language and the terminology used that may result into misinterpretation booting more problems (Simpson 2006-Ibid) they may have expertise in one area thus when anew thing is presented to them due to their inacquintance of the matter undesired result Is the out come.
In addition in times of crisis’s they may be late owing it to the lack of historical and confidential information   the lack of specific knowledge in general as compared to in house department (Boroshok 2006-Ibid) thus the collapse of the organization

There is provision of partial services due to the many clients and projects in the waiting list. With even bigger and financially stable companies in the list the small companies receive incomplete work. In addition they lack intimacy with the organization- outsource organization relation thus distaining the effort of the organization.

There is excessive division of labor with outsourcing, many projects and other priorities at hand they divide work to very many row employees who give undesired result. They also possess tendencies of assigning bulky work to inexperienced workers. The experienced once are sent to financially stable and high status organizations at the expense of the low financially unstable organization.

In conclusion its appropriate has the situation dictates for both in-house and out sourced PR departments in and organizations. However for purposes of confidence ease and relation an in house department is preferable to and out sourced; albeit out sourcing should always be at the back of the mind. 





Bibliography

Dough Newsom, Judy V. Turk, Dean Kruckebery (1996) (6th ed.) this is PR. The Realities of Public Relations. Wadsworth Publishing Company. London

Scot M. Cutlip, Allen A. Center, Glen M. Broom (2006)(9th ed) Effective Public Relation. Prentice Hall, New Jersey.

Websites

http://Careride.com_pr_adv_dis.of inhouse.public relation department.aspx.

Danielle L. Ace Reputation Maker (ARM) @ Nak Promotions
                                                                                                                   





Tuesday, 10 January 2012

SOMETHINGARIFIQUE


SOMETHING FOR SOMETHING, NOTHING FOR NOTHING
And if Christ be not risen, then is our preaching vain, and your faith is also vain.” 1Cor15:14(NKJV)

In everything in this universe, there is always a genesis and a revelation.  There is no two before one. Someone cannot claim, “I go there.” Where are you going, many will ask?  Jesus knew his genesis thereby He had a strong vivid picture of His revelation: Heaven.

Something for something, nothing emanates from nothing, but something does from something. Somewhere to somewhere; someone to someone or somewhere. Remember, to he who has (something) more shall be added unto him: something for something. Present something, out of it something springs up- from the eater something to eat and form the strong something sweet. Samson’s riddle. 

As in Adam all men die, so in Christ all men are made alive. Nothing with breathe was embedded in Adam, therefore was death inevitable. Christ hosted (permanently) a seed of life, what happens? All men are made alive. Alive.

In Him was the fullness of the God Head, the image of the invisible God. Think of what was housed in Adam? Nothing.  Moses and the young boy possessed something; a shepherd’s rod and 5 loaves and 2 fishes! Something was birthed. The Israelites delivered amidst an oceanic wave of miracles, albeit the waves were tsunamis to the Egyptians: 5000 men fed and remainders of 12 baskets as fragments gathered.

Possess something, present to Him, expect a harvest (something); thirty fold, sixty fold and hundred fold: He is not mocked. He is faithful to keep whatever you grant unto Him till that day. Something is only expected when it is presented to someone ‘Mr. O’, somewhere ‘C City’ and sometime ‘T hours GMT’. The era of presentation is one of agony, pain, thick darkness, death or life, tears, sweating blood for sweat, destitute (My Father, my Father why have forsaken me?) to mention a few; as labour pangs onto an expectant mother. The post era is overwhelming, faces glow with joy wrapped with appreciation after the child lays on its mothers arms, cuddling in new woolen white clothes. Images of angels gazing at it…. 

The shepherd’s rod, the widows oil, the two buttons (life of the old woman), the son of the Shaumarmite woman; the sacrifices of Manoah and his wife, Abraham, Gideon, Solomon et al.  Imagine Hannah taking little Samuel to the house of the Lord forever to redeem her vow. I see her sorrowfully happy, and glad, “at least I have something to be proud and respected of.” She heartily says. I see a mixture of white and black: gray somewhere, sometime. Jephthah could not hold it, but to cry, alas! his only was gone, “And Jephthah came to Mizpeh unto his house, and, behold, his daughter came out to meet him with timbrels and with dances: and she was his only child; beside her he had neither son nor daughter. And it came to pass, when he saw her, that he rent his clothes, and said, alas, my daughter! thou hast brought me very low, and thou art one of them that trouble me: for I have opened my mouth unto the LORD, and I cannot go back.” Judges 11:34-5 (NKJV). Agony.

Infinite things were offered to Him and gigantic results recorded and birthed. Present to God whatever little you have and He will do something from that little something. Try out and thank. Excuse me, it time to go and prepare my something for Him, him or her or even it.
Happy New Year and a something for something time.